NO, planet Earth is not going to explode, BUT if the politicians and people in general continue not to take things seriously, climatic change is going to cause, and with absolute guarantee, an unimaginable disaster, and it may even happen that the planet will change its orbit. Meaning the end of life on Earth.
Who is Dr. Linden? Click hereTo contact with Dr. Linden, click here
The hoax of all hoaxes
Global warming signals the end of mankind or emigration to the stars
The Theory of CO2 and the "Greenhouse Effect" as the origen of climatic change is a myth, a scientific impossibility
INTRODUCTION
I have 20 minutes to talk you about CO2 and climatic change. No subject on Earth has ever been of greater importance. Because it may even provoke a change of orbit of the planet and thus destroy all life, man included. We live here today thanks to a very fragile equilibrium of Nature, a Nature which most people, because of anthropocentrism and unrestrained greed, see no reason to respect. Few understand that their own future and that of the whole planet is in the balance.
First, I am going to demostrate that CO2 and "the greenhouse effect" as the origin of today's climatic change is a myth, a scientific impossibility.
Secondly, I will show that the carefully planned destruction of the tropical forests, or rain forests as some call them, is the real cause of global warming.
Let's first examine diagram 1 and 2. They show that at least 93% of world emissions of CO2 occur in the northern hemisphere.
Only some 6 - 7% are emitted in the southern hemisphere. This is quite logical because here there is much less land, fewer people, few industries and very few cars compared with the North.
Now, let's look at diagrams 3 - 5 showing models of the wind systems of the planet. All the world's wind systems originate in the equatorial belt, where the planet receives the maximum of solar energy. At the same time all the diagrams make it very clear that there are no wind currents crossing the equator.
Thus there is very little interchange between the atmospheres of the two hemispheres, and what there is is very slow. Because of this it has been recommended to take refuge in the southern hemisphere in case of nuclear war or accident in the northern hemisphere.
In the past sailing ships feared venturing into equatorial waters where the absence of winds risked leaving them adrift, sometimes for weeks.
At this point I want to recall that official measurements of atmospheric CO2 content are made at the Mauna Loa Observatory in Hawaii, north of the equator. These are the figures used and misused by the proponents of the CO2 / "greenhouse effect" theory.
But the difference in CO2 emissions to the north and to the south of the equator is very great, 93% versus 7%. And there is very little exchange of air between the two hemispheres.
Considering these well established scientific facts, can anyone explain to me how it is possible that the effects of what is attributed to CO2 and "the greenhouse effect", droughts, torrential rains and floods, increased temperatures, increased wind strength, melting of glaciares, etc, are equally strong, even stronger to the south of the equator, with less atmospheric CO2??